This study investigated the effects of feeding graded levels of white sorghum soaked in wood ash extract on performance, nutrient digestibility and carcass traits of broiler chickens. One hundred and forty-four day-old broiler chicks were randomly assigned to four experimental diets in a completely randomized design (CRD). Each treatment had 36 birds, divided into three replicates of 12 birds each. At the starter phase, birds fed the control diet (T1) had the highest significant (p<0.05) live weight (733.00g), feed intake (50.80g), weight gain (36.17g) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) OF (1.44). The highest protein efficiency ratio (3.37) was observed in birds fed T2 (25% WSSWAE). Birds fed T4 (75% WSSWAE) had the lowest (P<0.05) live weight, feed intake and weight gain. At the finishing phase, birds fed T1 had the highest (p<0.05) final live weight (2180.00g), body weight gain (51.68g) and feed intake (93.10g). The best feed conversion ratio (1.08) was observed in birds fed T1. Nutrient digestibility was highest (p<0.05) in birds fed T1, with dry matter (92.61%), crude protein (75.70%) and ash (74.88%). The highest (2165.00g) significant (p<0.05) de-feathered weight and 2115.00g eviscerated were observed from birds fed on T3 (50% WSSWAE) while the least value of 1980.00g and 1930.00g were noticed from T4 (75% WSSWAE). Birds on T1 (Control) revealed the highest (8.63g) significant (p<0.05) different while the least value of 8.27g was noticed from T4. Conclusively, white sorghum soaked in the wood ash extract can be replaced maize up to 50% without negative effect on performance, apparent nutrient digestibility, carcass traits and organ weights of the broiler finisher chickens. Therefore, 25% inclusion level of white sorghum soaked in wood ash extract is recommended to substituting maize in broiler chickens diets.
| Published in | International Journal of Animal Science and Technology (Volume 10, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijast.20261002.12 |
| Page(s) | 56-64 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Broiler Chickens, White Sorghum, Maize, Performance Quality, Carcass Traits, Organ Weights
Inclusion Levels of WSSWAE (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | |
Dietary Treatments | ||||
Ingredients (%) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Maize | 58.79 | 44.09 | 29.40 | 14.70 |
White sorghum | 0.00 | 14.70 | 29.40 | 44.09 |
Soya bean meal | 31.27 | 30.84 | 30.96 | 31.10 |
Fish meal | 1.80 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Wheat offal | 2.64 | 2.65 | 2.65 | 2.65 |
Bone meal | 3.95 | 4.17 | 4.04 | 3.91 |
Lysine | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Methionine | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Salt | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
Biomix (Broiler) | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Calculated analyses (%) | ||||
Crude protein | 22.00 | 22.11 | 22.32 | 22.40 |
Crude fibre | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3.53 | 3.57 |
Ether extract | 3.30 | 3.21 | 3.11 | 3.01 |
Calcium | 1.00 | 1.05 | 1.03 | 1.02 |
ME (Kcal/kg) | 3000.00 | 3000.00 | 3000.00 | 3000.00 |
Inclusion Levels of WSSWAE (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | |
Dietary Treatments | ||||
Ingredients (%) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Maize | 59.50 | 44.63 | 29.75 | 14.88 |
White sorghum grain | - | 14.88 | 29.75 | 44.63 |
Soya bean meal | 21.00 | 21.00 | 21.00 | 21.00 |
Fish meal | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Wheat offal | 14.00 | 14.00 | 14.00 | 14.00 |
Bone meal | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.50 |
Lysine | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Methionine | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Salt | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
Biomix (Broiler) | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Calculated analyses (%) | ||||
Crude protein | 20.00 | 20.01 | 20.02 | 20.03 |
Crude fibre | 5.62 | 6.11 | 6.50 | 6.98 |
Ether extract | 3.30 | 3.21 | 3.11 | 3.01 |
Calcium | 1.02 | 1.05 | 1.03 | 1.02 |
ME (Kcal/kg) | 2800.00 | 2800.00 | 2800.00 | 2800.00 |
Inclusion levels of WSSWAE (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | ||
Dietary Treatments | |||||
Parameters | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | SEM |
Initial live weight (g/bird) | 53.13 | 53.06 | 53.01 | 53.01 | 0.54 |
Final live weight (g/bird) | 733.00a | 718.33b | 730.16a | 707.33b | 28.71 |
Ave feed intake (g/bird) | 50.80a | 48.15b | 50.50a | 47.50b | 1.19 |
Ave weight gain (g/bird) | 36.17a | 35.65c | 36.07a | 35.26b | 3.37 |
Feed conversion ratio | 1.44a | 1.35b | 1.40a | 1.37b | 0.10 |
Protein efficiency ratio | 3.24b | 3.37a | 3.25b | 3.37a | 0.13 |
Inclusion levels of WSSWAE (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | ||
Dietary Treatments | |||||
Parameters | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | SEM |
Average Final body weight (g) | 2180.00a | 2100.00a | 2175.00a | 1990.52b | 23.96 |
Average daily weight (g/bird) | 51.68a | 48.83b | 51.49a | 44.87c | 2.29 |
Average daily feed intake (g/bird) | 93.10a | 87.20bc | 90.10ab | 85.00d | 3.13 |
Feed conversion ratio | 1.08a | 1.79b | 1.75b | 1.89ab | 0.14 |
Protein efficiency ratio | 2.78a | 2.80a | 2.86a | 2.64b | 0.22 |
Inclusion Levels of WSSWAE (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | ||
Dietary treatments | |||||
Parameters (%) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | SEM± |
Dry Matter | 92.61a | 92.10bc | 92.29b | 89.10d | 1.05 |
Crude Protein | 75.70a | 75.26bc | 75.36b | 73.70d | 0.48 |
Crude Fibre | 75.50 | 75.00 | 74.50 | 73.00 | 0.77 |
Ether Extract | 77.29 | 74.21 | 76.31 | 75.02 | 0.82 |
Ash | 74.88a | 74.28bc | 74.38b | 72.22d | 0.96 |
NFE | 89.54 | 88.10 | 88.50 | 84.50 | 1.97 |
Inclusion levels of WSSWAE (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | ||
Dietary treatments | |||||
Parameters | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | SEM± |
Live Weight (g/bird) | 2180.00a | 2100.00a | 2175.00b | 1990.00b | 23.96 |
De-feathered weight (g) | 2160.00a | 2083.00b | 2165.00a | 1980.00bc | 12.50 |
Eviscerated weight (g) | 2110.00a | 2033.00b | 2115.00a | 1930.00bc | 1.05 |
Dressing (%) | 96.79 | 96.81 | 97.24 | 96.99 | 0.43 |
Cut parts (%) | |||||
Head | 2.51 | 2.47 | 2.47 | 2.84 | 0.20 |
Neck | 4.72 | 4.29 | 4.78 | 4.12 | 0.17 |
Shank | 3.60 | 3.75 | 4.54 | 3.89 | 0.12 |
Drumstick | 10.62 | 10.09 | 10.34 | 9.89 | 0.24 |
Breast | 20.24 | 17.95 | 19.83 | 17.86 | 0.33 |
Back | 16.22 | 15.51 | 16.00 | 15.00 | 0.28 |
Thigh | 10.48 | 10.36 | 10.38 | 9.89 | 0.16 |
Wing | 8.63a | 8.35ab | 8.40a | 8.27b | 0.24 |
Organ weights (%) | |||||
Heart | 0.57 | 0.51 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 0.01 |
Gizzard | 4.00 | 2.93 | 3.50 | 3.01 | 0.09 |
Liver | 2.79 | 2.52 | 2.76 | 2.24 | 0.05 |
Intestine | 4.55 | 4.99 | 5.07 | 5.37 | 0.05 |
Lungs | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.03 |
Ave | Average |
CRD | Completely Randomized Design |
DMRT | Duncan Multiple Range Test |
FCR | Feed Conversion Ratio |
Kcal/kg | Kilocalories per Kilograme |
ME | Metabolizable Energy |
N | North |
NE | North East |
PER | Protein Efficiency Ratio |
SEM | Standard Error of Mean |
T1 to 4 | Treatments 1 to 4 |
WSSWAE | White Sorghum Soaked in Wood Ash Extract |
| [1] | Uzonwanne, M. C., Francis, O. C., and Nwokoye, M. O., (2023). Impact of livestock production on gross domestic product in Nigeria. International Journal of Advanced Economics. 5(5): 107–118. |
| [2] | FAO., 2022. Livestock Sector Development in Nigeria. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, UK, 2022. |
| [3] | FAO., 2021. Poultry meat production statistics. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, UK. |
| [4] | Oladokun, V. and Johnson, A. (2012). Feed formulation problem in Nigerian poultry farms: a mathematical programming approach. Animal Journal of Science Industrial Resources 3(1): 14–20. |
| [5] | Attah, J. O (2002) Principles and practice of livestock feed manufacturing. Adlek Printers. Ilorin. Kwara state. Nigeria, pp. 13-17. Adlek printers. |
| [6] | Wilk, M., Król, B., Słupczyńska, M., Sowiński, J., Antoszkiewicz, Z., Pecka-Kiełb, E., Asghar, M. U. (2022). In vitro rumen methanogenesis and fermentation profile of sorghum whole crop cereal and bagasse ensilaged with inoculum Lactobacillus buchneri. Pakistan Veterinary Journal. 42: 41–46. |
| [7] | Manwar, S. J. and Mandal, A. B. (2009). Effect of reconstitution of sorghum with or without enzymes on production performance and immunocompetence in broiler chicken. 89(6): 998–1005. |
| [8] | AOAC. (2001). Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington (DC), USA. |
| [9] | SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Students) Version 27. IBM inc. 444MichiganAvenue, Chicago IL60611, USA. |
| [10] | Duncan, D. B (1955). Multiple Range and F-Tests, Biometrics, 11: 25-40. |
| [11] | Mabelebele, M., Gous, R. M., Siwela, M., O’Nell, H. V. M and Iji, P. A (2017). Performance of broiler chickens fed South African Sorghum-based diets with xylanase. South African Journal of Animal Science. 47(5). Page; 679-687. |
| [12] | Adeyemo, G. O., Fashola, O. O and Ademulegun, T. I. (2016). Effect of stocking density on the performance, carcass yield and meat composition of broiler chickens. British Biotechnology Journal 14(1): 1-7. |
| [13] | Esonu, B. O., Anumni, P., Obinna, K. and Eneremadu, O. F. (1999). Evaluations of combinations of Maize/Sorghum based brewer’s grains, cocoyam corm and cassava root meals as substitute for maize in broiler finisher diets. Indian Journal of Animal Science 69: 129-130. |
| [14] | Weurding, R. E., Veldman, A., Veen, W. A., van der Aar, P. J., Verstegen, M. W. (2001). Starch digestion rate in the small intestine of broiler chickens differs among feedstuffs. Journal of Nutrition. 131(9): 2329–2335. |
| [15] | Alagawany, M., Elnesr, S. S., Farag, M. R., Tiwari, R., Yatoo, M. I and Karthik, K. (2020). Nutritional significance of amino acids, vitamins and minerals as nutraceuticals in poultry production and health-a comprehensive review. Veterinary quarterly, 41(1), pp. 1-29. |
APA Style
Osayomwanbo, O. D., Omoh, O. S., Eikaehor, E. E. T., Olatunde, R. M., Rafiu, A. A., et al. (2026). Performance Quality, Nutrient Digestibility and Carcass Traits of Broiler Chickens Fed Graded Levels of White Sorghum Soaked in Wood Ash Extract. International Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 10(2), 56-64. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20261002.12
ACS Style
Osayomwanbo, O. D.; Omoh, O. S.; Eikaehor, E. E. T.; Olatunde, R. M.; Rafiu, A. A., et al. Performance Quality, Nutrient Digestibility and Carcass Traits of Broiler Chickens Fed Graded Levels of White Sorghum Soaked in Wood Ash Extract. Int. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2026, 10(2), 56-64. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20261002.12
AMA Style
Osayomwanbo OD, Omoh OS, Eikaehor EET, Olatunde RM, Rafiu AA, et al. Performance Quality, Nutrient Digestibility and Carcass Traits of Broiler Chickens Fed Graded Levels of White Sorghum Soaked in Wood Ash Extract. Int J Anim Sci Technol. 2026;10(2):56-64. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20261002.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijast.20261002.12,
author = {Obasoyo Dick Osayomwanbo and Omoikojie Stanley Omoh and Ehebha Eromosele Theophilus Eikaehor and Raji Mumini Olatunde and Asafa Adebayo Rafiu and Onigemo Murisiku Adegbemi and Ishola Olawale Jelili and Bamgbose Adeyemi Mustafa},
title = {Performance Quality, Nutrient Digestibility and Carcass Traits of Broiler Chickens Fed Graded Levels of White Sorghum Soaked in Wood Ash Extract},
journal = {International Journal of Animal Science and Technology},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {56-64},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijast.20261002.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20261002.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijast.20261002.12},
abstract = {This study investigated the effects of feeding graded levels of white sorghum soaked in wood ash extract on performance, nutrient digestibility and carcass traits of broiler chickens. One hundred and forty-four day-old broiler chicks were randomly assigned to four experimental diets in a completely randomized design (CRD). Each treatment had 36 birds, divided into three replicates of 12 birds each. At the starter phase, birds fed the control diet (T1) had the highest significant (p<0.05) live weight (733.00g), feed intake (50.80g), weight gain (36.17g) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) OF (1.44). The highest protein efficiency ratio (3.37) was observed in birds fed T2 (25% WSSWAE). Birds fed T4 (75% WSSWAE) had the lowest (P<0.05) live weight, feed intake and weight gain. At the finishing phase, birds fed T1 had the highest (p<0.05) final live weight (2180.00g), body weight gain (51.68g) and feed intake (93.10g). The best feed conversion ratio (1.08) was observed in birds fed T1. Nutrient digestibility was highest (p<0.05) in birds fed T1, with dry matter (92.61%), crude protein (75.70%) and ash (74.88%). The highest (2165.00g) significant (p<0.05) de-feathered weight and 2115.00g eviscerated were observed from birds fed on T3 (50% WSSWAE) while the least value of 1980.00g and 1930.00g were noticed from T4 (75% WSSWAE). Birds on T1 (Control) revealed the highest (8.63g) significant (p<0.05) different while the least value of 8.27g was noticed from T4. Conclusively, white sorghum soaked in the wood ash extract can be replaced maize up to 50% without negative effect on performance, apparent nutrient digestibility, carcass traits and organ weights of the broiler finisher chickens. Therefore, 25% inclusion level of white sorghum soaked in wood ash extract is recommended to substituting maize in broiler chickens diets.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Performance Quality, Nutrient Digestibility and Carcass Traits of Broiler Chickens Fed Graded Levels of White Sorghum Soaked in Wood Ash Extract AU - Obasoyo Dick Osayomwanbo AU - Omoikojie Stanley Omoh AU - Ehebha Eromosele Theophilus Eikaehor AU - Raji Mumini Olatunde AU - Asafa Adebayo Rafiu AU - Onigemo Murisiku Adegbemi AU - Ishola Olawale Jelili AU - Bamgbose Adeyemi Mustafa Y1 - 2026/06/25 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20261002.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijast.20261002.12 T2 - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology JF - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology JO - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology SP - 56 EP - 64 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1312 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20261002.12 AB - This study investigated the effects of feeding graded levels of white sorghum soaked in wood ash extract on performance, nutrient digestibility and carcass traits of broiler chickens. One hundred and forty-four day-old broiler chicks were randomly assigned to four experimental diets in a completely randomized design (CRD). Each treatment had 36 birds, divided into three replicates of 12 birds each. At the starter phase, birds fed the control diet (T1) had the highest significant (p<0.05) live weight (733.00g), feed intake (50.80g), weight gain (36.17g) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) OF (1.44). The highest protein efficiency ratio (3.37) was observed in birds fed T2 (25% WSSWAE). Birds fed T4 (75% WSSWAE) had the lowest (P<0.05) live weight, feed intake and weight gain. At the finishing phase, birds fed T1 had the highest (p<0.05) final live weight (2180.00g), body weight gain (51.68g) and feed intake (93.10g). The best feed conversion ratio (1.08) was observed in birds fed T1. Nutrient digestibility was highest (p<0.05) in birds fed T1, with dry matter (92.61%), crude protein (75.70%) and ash (74.88%). The highest (2165.00g) significant (p<0.05) de-feathered weight and 2115.00g eviscerated were observed from birds fed on T3 (50% WSSWAE) while the least value of 1980.00g and 1930.00g were noticed from T4 (75% WSSWAE). Birds on T1 (Control) revealed the highest (8.63g) significant (p<0.05) different while the least value of 8.27g was noticed from T4. Conclusively, white sorghum soaked in the wood ash extract can be replaced maize up to 50% without negative effect on performance, apparent nutrient digestibility, carcass traits and organ weights of the broiler finisher chickens. Therefore, 25% inclusion level of white sorghum soaked in wood ash extract is recommended to substituting maize in broiler chickens diets. VL - 10 IS - 2 ER -